<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Otakon: A Brief Study of Pantslessness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/</link>
	<description>The Creators of Spoiler: The Panel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:17:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willow</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Willow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-211</guid>
		<description>For the record, I wouldn&#039;t be offended if you all performed in the nude! Yes, that&#039;s right sans clothes entirely! But, that&#039;s just me and my opinion. 

To me, what society in general accepts as &quot;ok attire&quot; is completely hypocritical and judgemental. It&#039;s ok for hot girls to walk around in a bra and a skimpy pair of panties but it&#039;s not okay for a guy to walk around in boxers? Boxers generally cover up more than the bra and panties do! As I said before, I don&#039;t care if you all perform in your birthday suits, but I would think that as long as all the private parts were covered, society wouldn&#039;t really care what was worn. Course that&#039;s, obviously, not the case.

(PS: Should Ota staff read this comment, I am talking directly about society in general--not Otakon policies or rules. Like Angelo (and the rest of DOXIII) I completely respect Ota rules and the rights they have to create and uphold said rules~)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I wouldn&#8217;t be offended if you all performed in the nude! Yes, that&#8217;s right sans clothes entirely! But, that&#8217;s just me and my opinion. </p>
<p>To me, what society in general accepts as &#8220;ok attire&#8221; is completely hypocritical and judgemental. It&#8217;s ok for hot girls to walk around in a bra and a skimpy pair of panties but it&#8217;s not okay for a guy to walk around in boxers? Boxers generally cover up more than the bra and panties do! As I said before, I don&#8217;t care if you all perform in your birthday suits, but I would think that as long as all the private parts were covered, society wouldn&#8217;t really care what was worn. Course that&#8217;s, obviously, not the case.</p>
<p>(PS: Should Ota staff read this comment, I am talking directly about society in general&#8211;not Otakon policies or rules. Like Angelo (and the rest of DOXIII) I completely respect Ota rules and the rights they have to create and uphold said rules~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-200</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably not as bad as either you or Otakon are making it out to be. Sounds like a standard issue of two people arguing over the internet to me. Two mature professionals enter a forum and it turns into a flame war. That&#039;s how the internet works you know.

If I were you, I would stop worrying. Actually, if I were both of you I would apologize to the other and call it a day so you can get back to how things were in the old days, as you put it. Either way I don&#039;t think you are going to get booted from the convention or get a bad time slot or something because of this. I&#039;m a panelist at this year&#039;s Otakon too and I have always known them to be professional and not petty. If they started screwing over every panelist they ever had a disagreement with, 1, the panelists would riot and 2, they probably wouldn&#039;t have a panel track to begin with.

So seriously, both of you, just stop it, admit that you both need each other, and go have a drink together or something to call it even. You are professionals. You are both above all of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably not as bad as either you or Otakon are making it out to be. Sounds like a standard issue of two people arguing over the internet to me. Two mature professionals enter a forum and it turns into a flame war. That&#8217;s how the internet works you know.</p>
<p>If I were you, I would stop worrying. Actually, if I were both of you I would apologize to the other and call it a day so you can get back to how things were in the old days, as you put it. Either way I don&#8217;t think you are going to get booted from the convention or get a bad time slot or something because of this. I&#8217;m a panelist at this year&#8217;s Otakon too and I have always known them to be professional and not petty. If they started screwing over every panelist they ever had a disagreement with, 1, the panelists would riot and 2, they probably wouldn&#8217;t have a panel track to begin with.</p>
<p>So seriously, both of you, just stop it, admit that you both need each other, and go have a drink together or something to call it even. You are professionals. You are both above all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NGL0</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>NGL0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Jim,

I am not trying to paint you as Hypocritical in the least. One of the first things I said in this essay was.

&lt;em&gt;I understand their original argument, that the BCC had policies against that sort of thing. THAT makes total sense. However, is taking off your pants NEVER allowable in public or polite company?&lt;/em&gt;

I acknowledged the BCCs policies against that sort of thing and I understand Otakon&#039;s position. Frankly, I could care less about about my pants. This whole thing started as a joke, a possible thing to do just for the hell of it, and snowballed into an argument that, frankly I don&#039;t get. I&#039;m not fighting to take my pants off, that&#039;s foolish and childish. However, I don&#039;t understand where it shifted from harmless discussion to serious argument. I mean, it feels like no one is listening to the parts of my posts that say &quot;I get it, I&#039;m totally in compliance with your policies, I have respect for Otakon, and I wouldn&#039;t do anything to jeopardize the con.&quot; Like, I&#039;m trying to make it absolutely clear that the simple word &quot;No&quot; was enough for me, but it seems like I can&#039;t be apologetic enough. It seems as if even discussing the differences in policies and reasons behind them is viewed as trying to troll or undermine the convention.

I don&#039;t bring up other conventions I have been pantsless at becuase I&#039;m trying to make some sort of &quot;they let me do it, you guys should let me do it too&quot; argument. I bring them up becuase if we were having a discussion ABOUT the notion of rules of propriety and they show how ideas behind these rules can change. They can change becuase some cons treat it as a private event with consent involved, they can change whether the cons are at a convention center or a hotel, they can change for a myriad of reasons pertinent to this discussion. I mean, we are adults right? Can&#039;t adults just talk about this stuff? Can&#039;t we just have a discussion? Isn&#039;t that what forums are for? Having discussions?

I&#039;m not angry about being told &quot;keep your pants on.&quot; That&#039;s totally reasonable. I&#039;m a little pissed off becuase I feel that things are getting overly confrontational. I mean, I and other members of Disorganization XIII have been going to and performing at Otakon for years. We have had a wonderful relationship with Otakon in the past! Now, this year I decide to come out of hiding and post a bit on the forums and suddenly everything goes to shit? It&#039;s like things that Ota staff was perfectly comfortable talking with me about over a beer or a doughnut are now massively taboo. Please correct me if I am wrong or if I am taking responses to my posts in the wrong way but... doesn&#039;t that seem weird to you. I mean you guys were our friends! Disorganization XIII&#039;s allies! Letting us perform there before we even had a name for our group!

My essay was an attempt to show that things aren&#039;t as black and white as they seem, not an attack on Otakon. Frankly, I just want things to go back to the way they were before I started posting on Otakon&#039;s forums, when it was about performing and making fans laugh rather than pants and pants policies. You guys have no idea how important performing at Otakon is to every Disorganization XIII member and every Disorganization XIII fan, and I mean you are OTAKON! You are a monster of a con that could literally flip us off and kick us to the curb if you wanted to. I just don&#039;t know what else I can type to show you guys that we&lt;em&gt; like you&lt;/em&gt; and that we aren&#039;t trying to undermine, attack, or troll you guys in any way. We are just trying to talk about shit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>I am not trying to paint you as Hypocritical in the least. One of the first things I said in this essay was.</p>
<p><em>I understand their original argument, that the BCC had policies against that sort of thing. THAT makes total sense. However, is taking off your pants NEVER allowable in public or polite company?</em></p>
<p>I acknowledged the BCCs policies against that sort of thing and I understand Otakon&#8217;s position. Frankly, I could care less about about my pants. This whole thing started as a joke, a possible thing to do just for the hell of it, and snowballed into an argument that, frankly I don&#8217;t get. I&#8217;m not fighting to take my pants off, that&#8217;s foolish and childish. However, I don&#8217;t understand where it shifted from harmless discussion to serious argument. I mean, it feels like no one is listening to the parts of my posts that say &#8220;I get it, I&#8217;m totally in compliance with your policies, I have respect for Otakon, and I wouldn&#8217;t do anything to jeopardize the con.&#8221; Like, I&#8217;m trying to make it absolutely clear that the simple word &#8220;No&#8221; was enough for me, but it seems like I can&#8217;t be apologetic enough. It seems as if even discussing the differences in policies and reasons behind them is viewed as trying to troll or undermine the convention.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t bring up other conventions I have been pantsless at becuase I&#8217;m trying to make some sort of &#8220;they let me do it, you guys should let me do it too&#8221; argument. I bring them up becuase if we were having a discussion ABOUT the notion of rules of propriety and they show how ideas behind these rules can change. They can change becuase some cons treat it as a private event with consent involved, they can change whether the cons are at a convention center or a hotel, they can change for a myriad of reasons pertinent to this discussion. I mean, we are adults right? Can&#8217;t adults just talk about this stuff? Can&#8217;t we just have a discussion? Isn&#8217;t that what forums are for? Having discussions?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not angry about being told &#8220;keep your pants on.&#8221; That&#8217;s totally reasonable. I&#8217;m a little pissed off becuase I feel that things are getting overly confrontational. I mean, I and other members of Disorganization XIII have been going to and performing at Otakon for years. We have had a wonderful relationship with Otakon in the past! Now, this year I decide to come out of hiding and post a bit on the forums and suddenly everything goes to shit? It&#8217;s like things that Ota staff was perfectly comfortable talking with me about over a beer or a doughnut are now massively taboo. Please correct me if I am wrong or if I am taking responses to my posts in the wrong way but&#8230; doesn&#8217;t that seem weird to you. I mean you guys were our friends! Disorganization XIII&#8217;s allies! Letting us perform there before we even had a name for our group!</p>
<p>My essay was an attempt to show that things aren&#8217;t as black and white as they seem, not an attack on Otakon. Frankly, I just want things to go back to the way they were before I started posting on Otakon&#8217;s forums, when it was about performing and making fans laugh rather than pants and pants policies. You guys have no idea how important performing at Otakon is to every Disorganization XIII member and every Disorganization XIII fan, and I mean you are OTAKON! You are a monster of a con that could literally flip us off and kick us to the curb if you wanted to. I just don&#8217;t know what else I can type to show you guys that we<em> like you</em> and that we aren&#8217;t trying to undermine, attack, or troll you guys in any way. We are just trying to talk about shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Vowles</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Vowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but you miss the part where I mentioned that the BCC requires proper clothing and not just underwear.  They&#039;ll stretch the rules pretty far for an obvious costume, but just taking your pants off and hanging in your underoos isn&#039;t going to fly. Do that in a public place and you might well be guilty of indecent exposure. The rules have long emphasized that if you can&#039;t do it outside, you can&#039;t do it inside the con, either.  

Personally, I don&#039;t really care about your pants. And I tend to agree with you that the rules of propriety can be pretty arbitrary.  But your essay seems to pretend those rules about attire don&#039;t exist, and paints us as hypocritical, and I think that is a bit unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but you miss the part where I mentioned that the BCC requires proper clothing and not just underwear.  They&#8217;ll stretch the rules pretty far for an obvious costume, but just taking your pants off and hanging in your underoos isn&#8217;t going to fly. Do that in a public place and you might well be guilty of indecent exposure. The rules have long emphasized that if you can&#8217;t do it outside, you can&#8217;t do it inside the con, either.  </p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t really care about your pants. And I tend to agree with you that the rules of propriety can be pretty arbitrary.  But your essay seems to pretend those rules about attire don&#8217;t exist, and paints us as hypocritical, and I think that is a bit unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsumi</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tsumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Honestly I can understand the reasoning for that response. I read that thread and my rebuttal is: I can see that you weren&#039;t really even trying to troll them. You guys were curious. However, the rule of public indecency still applies. True that a lot of cosplayers stretch the concept of what is acceptable and what isn&#039;t, but many are technically not even in their underwear. Therefore, it technically is acceptable.  IMO, I wouldn&#039;t bother touching this subject any further. No means no. I don&#039;t think it would have honestly mattered if it happened at other conventions. The discussion dealt with Otakon. Sure it could happen elsewhere but that&#039;s not the subject at hand. From what I saw in that entire thread, you were bringing up a lot of mentions of other conventions who probably would have accepted the pantsless idea. Personally, I don&#039;t really care about it. So long as it follows the rules, then I&#039;m fine. But if it doesn&#039;t, then better to just drop it instead of turning it into a long long long long discussion about morality and stuff. No point in dragging it on and on. If it was a central part of your panel, i can understand you getting uppity about it but it doesn&#039;t seem like it so...yeah. I have nothing more to add -waits for impending flames-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I can understand the reasoning for that response. I read that thread and my rebuttal is: I can see that you weren&#8217;t really even trying to troll them. You guys were curious. However, the rule of public indecency still applies. True that a lot of cosplayers stretch the concept of what is acceptable and what isn&#8217;t, but many are technically not even in their underwear. Therefore, it technically is acceptable.  IMO, I wouldn&#8217;t bother touching this subject any further. No means no. I don&#8217;t think it would have honestly mattered if it happened at other conventions. The discussion dealt with Otakon. Sure it could happen elsewhere but that&#8217;s not the subject at hand. From what I saw in that entire thread, you were bringing up a lot of mentions of other conventions who probably would have accepted the pantsless idea. Personally, I don&#8217;t really care about it. So long as it follows the rules, then I&#8217;m fine. But if it doesn&#8217;t, then better to just drop it instead of turning it into a long long long long discussion about morality and stuff. No point in dragging it on and on. If it was a central part of your panel, i can understand you getting uppity about it but it doesn&#8217;t seem like it so&#8230;yeah. I have nothing more to add -waits for impending flames-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARIO</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>MARIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I support you guys! I&#039;ll be going to Otakon and I&#039;ll be coming to your panel. You guys are awesome! Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support you guys! I&#8217;ll be going to Otakon and I&#8217;ll be coming to your panel. You guys are awesome! Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/2010/07/06/otakon-a-brief-study-of-pantslessness/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disorganization-xiii.com/main/?p=537#comment-192</guid>
		<description>As an addendum, I would point out that Angelo performed lawyerly duties at the AUSA 18+ edition of Anime Parliament sans pants, and there were no riots. We just wanted to take off our pants when sitting behind a table. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an addendum, I would point out that Angelo performed lawyerly duties at the AUSA 18+ edition of Anime Parliament sans pants, and there were no riots. We just wanted to take off our pants when sitting behind a table. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

